Talk:How To Efficiently Use Data Persistence

Most of the information here so far isn't important - DataComplexity isn't measured in bytes, and it's not based on the XML required to store it. --SNCPlay42 20:54, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

This page is just plain useless. Nobody is going to care about the XML of an object and how much space it takes up; and even less, try to minimize it. --MrNicNac 22:06, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

But strings are more efficient than instances. Especially when attempting to save space. I might as well finish this.

^{Posted by blocco (talk) on Apr 15, 2011 (Friday) at 00:03 (UTC) [Discuss format]}

The amount that is saved is small enough to the point where it wouldn't matter.--MrNicNac 11:50, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

But, which would allow for more data? 100 String Values or 100 Strings? Consider that if perhaps one is making an SB, they would think about this.

^{Posted by blocco (talk) on Apr 15, 2011 (Friday) at 19:44 (UTC) [Discuss format]}

You know the answer to that, but again, no one is really going to care.--MrNicNac 11:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC)