Template talk:ObjectPage

Shouldn't you make it where if there is no derived classes for an object(which happens in most cases) that the derived object box doesn't show up?

Mattchewy (talk • contribs)

02:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I thought about that too. Haven't yet worked out how to though

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

09:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I did :P If there is no derived classes now, the box doesn't show up

Mattchewy (talk • contribs)

19:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Superclass

I noticed that there is no use of the class's superclass. Well that be coming? Camoy • Contribs (January 23 2011)

Isn't superclass used to get derived methods/properties/events and used in the derived classes template?

Mattchewy (talk • contribs)

22:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I meant as in underneath the object's name in the old version it said extends Instance, I was wondering if that was going to be added. Camoy • Contribs (January 23 2011)

Does it need to be added? I can add it.

Mattchewy (talk • contribs)

22:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

It was a pretty handy feature. Camoy • Contribs (January 23 2011)

I added it :D

Mattchewy (talk • contribs)

22:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Default Superclass

Can some editor edit this template so that, if no superclass exists, the Instance superclass is chosen by default? I believe that'd be logical.

JulienDethurens 

1 February 2012

Hum, so, can some editor edit the template to change that..?

JulienDethurens

9 February 2012

Why? The whole point is that instance is set on the Object:.../superclass page for all objects, so that the derived classes box can be correctly populated.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

07:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)