User talk:Legend26: Difference between revisions
→"Are we supposed to use the type template on properties or what are we supposed to do now anyway?": new section
>NXTBoy |
>JulienDethurens (→"Are we supposed to use the type template on properties or what are we supposed to do now anyway?": new section) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::Can and should.{{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=22:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)}} | :::Can and should.{{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=22:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)}} | ||
:::For now, anyway. I'd be tempted to combine them onto one page somehow, since most of the time the enum is exclusive to that property.{{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=22:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)}} | :::For now, anyway. I'd be tempted to combine them onto one page somehow, since most of the time the enum is exclusive to that property.{{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=22:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)}} | ||
== Responded == | |||
I have responded on [[User_talk:Quenty|my talk page]]. {{User:Quenty/sig|date=January 16}} | |||
== "Are we supposed to use the type template on properties or what are we supposed to do now anyway?" == | |||
I'd guess both are fine.. The {{tl|type}} template <em>does</em> allow us to change the style of types easily, but, after all, that's not really so useful, and considering 99% of the wiki already uses links... --[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]] 22:09, 19 March 2012 (EDT) | |||